Ronald Dworkin's views Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Ronald Dworkins views - Personal Statement Example4) Mill Stuarts ideas on drop offdom of ideas may be better choice. Though it doesnt alone agrees with it, it does agree with the idea of allowing the free flow of ideas so for complete merciful development as one doesnt know what will turn out to be beneficial for kind-hearted beings in future. Thus human beings, their society and their civilization to complete flourish, free flow of all kinds of ideas should be allowed5) If we give jimmy to free expression, then any law prohibiting free expression or dictating to people to live their lives in veritable manners should be prohibited/banned. However, it can argued that certain free expression may lead to social destruction, and thus the law continues to be implemented. But then, we dont know, as Mills said, what sort of ideas will be beneficial for human beings and what shouldnt be. And thus for complete development, all ideas mustiness be allowed to be circulated.6) But in orde r to ban pornography one needs to being in evidence showing the harm caused by increase of pornography. However, the committee has been unable to bring in any such evidence. Restriction is non much of chore as it doesnt seriously curtail the ideas that pornography might contribute to society7) This report is goal based. It seeks not a definite goal but a goal where most people have what they want. It doesnt consider pornography outright wrong, crude and disgusting but doesnt admit that it is a less desirable subscriber to intellectual development. It assumes that society, with allowance of free flow, will make intelligent ideas of what is good for them and live accordingly. But it admit that not all ideas are conducive to human development or will produce the best society some time in future, thus some curtailment and restriction of pornography must be practiced.8) Why should live sex be prohibited Is complete ban of live sex, supported by the report If yes, why What the report s ays bring forth the idea that it is because others (those not involved, neither audience or performers) suffer from mental distress knowing that other people are involved in it. But the report had, initially rejected all harms of mental nature. And if people should stop doing what they want to do, only because others dont like it, it means that they dont have complete liberty to live their lives as they wish. --- This cannot be true or supported by the report that others find it degrading. It is supports its ban because it is indeed degrading. That means it can lead to cultural pollution. However, the report does admit that it takes part so rarely that its effect would be minimum. Thirdly, in its case, slippery slop public debate will be too self-coloured. However, writer finds no strong argument to ban it. It believes thats the live sex is intolerable even in restricted form, should be banned even wen the committee have no strong argument against it.9) Why prohibit some materia l and restrict another In case of restriction of open advertising, it offers 3 arguments in its favor. 1) More harm in public display than personal consumption 2) cultural pollution is greater 3) the slippery slope is less of a danger because material of any value is still be exchanged, though privately.10) Considering argument number 1) by limiting the pornographic material to those who want it, does not defeat the purpose of its publication that is blue-chip exchange of ideas still takes place, except lesser income for its author.